Everyone in San Francisco knows someone who has been evicted thanks to an “owner move-in eviction.” But what happens if a tenant moves out of their apartment and their landlord doesn’t follow the law and move in? What happens if a landlord re-rents the apartment to a new tenant? In this article we discuss the consequences for what we commonly refer to as a fraudulent owner-move in eviction and the options for tenants who have been wrongfully evicted.
For starters, it’s important to address what an owner-move in eviction even is. An Owner Move-In Eviction happens when a landlord evicts a tenant from so that the owner or one of the owner’s relatives can move into the vacated apartment / house. An Owner Move-in – or “OMI” Eviction is one of the sixteen allowable grounds for an eviction in San Francisco. However, for an OMI Eviction to be valid a landlord must follow a number of requirements that are outlined under the Rent Ordinance.
To do an owner-move in eviction, a landlord has to follow certain rules under the Rent Ordinance. They can’t simply tell a tenant they have to move. These rules include but are not limited to:
If a landlord doesn’t continue to live in the apartment for five years they have a duty to offer the unit back to the evicted tenants.
Tenant who get served with an owner-move in eviction notice have a choice to make: fight the eviction or move out within sixty days.
Fighting the eviction means that the tenant will have to prove that their landlord lacks the “intent” to move into the apartment as their principle place of residence. However, proving a landlord’s lack of intent is its own sort of challenge. If a tenant truly doesn’t think their landlord will move in, then this can be a good option to explore.
For many of our clients it’s no small feat to just move out of their long-term home. However, for those tenants who do choose to move out, we strongly advise that they monitor their old apartment. Tenants who have been evicted under a bogus owner-move in have potential claims for hundreds of thousands of dollars for a wrongful eviction.
Just because a landlord says they will move in doesn’t mean they will follow through. In many instances landlords DO re-rent these apartments, leave them vacant or use the place part time. Each of these uses violates the law.
Here are some ways tenants can keep tabs on their former landlord to see if they are being honest:
If your landlord doesn’t follow the law and either leaves your apartment vacant or re-rents your place to someone new you likely have grounds to sue your landlord for what is called a “wrongful eviction.”
Tenants who are forced to vacate on the basis of an owner or relative move-in eviction under false pretenses are entitled to substantial financial damages. wrongful owner move-in eviction case can result in substantial damages.
Your rent-controlled apartment is a huge asset and losing it has real financial consequences for most tenants. If you are forced to leave and you suspect your landlord isn’t following the law regarding an owner move-in eviction it is critical that you contact a dedicated tenant’s rights lawyer to explore your options. You may be able to get your home back or recover money for your landlord’s wrongdoing.
Because there are time limitations as to when you can file a lawsuit against your old landlord it is important not to sit on this information or suspicion.
Just because your landlord claims they are evicting you in order to move in doesn’t mean you’re out of options or that you should take their word for it. Your landlord has to follow several steps in order to comply with the law and there is no guarantee they will do so. Many landlords assert they will move in and then never do. Given what a tenant is losing when they move out of their rent-controlled home and the potential to recover significant money from a landlord that violates the law, it is worth taking these steps.
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco couple who were forced to give up their home of over twenty years after their landlord’s dog attacked and killed their dog.Read More
Recovered on behalf of an Oakland tenant who suffered a serious injury due to her landlord’s negligent maintenance of her home.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant who suffered personal injuries and was forced to vacate his home of fifteen years after dealing with many months of environmental contamination and disruptive and nuisance construction conditions.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a group of 30 tenants living in an SRO in San Francisco who were living with horrendous conditions in their rent controlled apartments, including rodents, bedbugs, mold, water leaks and harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of three families living in a building in San Francisco’s SOMA neighborhood who were forced to live with substandard conditions for years as a result of their landlord’s negligence, including issues with lack of heat, lack of hot water and cockroach/rat infestations.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a couple living in a rent-controlled home in the outer Sunset neighborhood. Our clients were forced to vacate after the landlord served them with an Owner Move-In Eviction Notice. After the landlords failed to move into the property, our clients filed suit for wrongful eviction.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant in Russian Hill. Tenant was forced to vacate her illegal apartment in retaliation for reporting unlawful rent increases to the San Francisco Rent Board.Read More
Recovered for a single long-term tenant in San Francisco. Our client was forced to move out of his apartment as a result of extreme landlord harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of three long-term tenants in San Francisco’s Castro neighborhood who were constructively evicted due to noise and nuisance conditions created by their downstairs neighbors, which the owner refused to address.Read More
Recovered on behalf of elderly, disabled tenant who was forced to move out of her rent-controlled San Francisco apartment of 50 years after landlord/owner failed to resolve numerous building code violations that remained outstanding for over a decade.Read More
Recovered on behalf of seven tenants living in a makeshift boarding house in East Palo Alto.Read More
Recovered on behalf of two former San Francisco tenants who were evicted via an Owner Move-In Eviction and owner failed to occupy the unit as her primary place of residence.Read More
Recovered on behalf of an elderly long-term tenant who was forced to vacate her long San Francisco apartment as a result of her landlord’s refusal to address longstanding defective conditions, including lack of heat, mold, rodent infestations, and defective plumbing. Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant who was forced to vacate his home as a result of ongoing, disruptive construction and the owners’ refusal to provide him with alternative housing. Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco family that was constructively evicted from their home in the Richmond District as a result of unlawful rent increases, defective conditions and tenant harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a tenant living in an illegal “in-law” unit. In this case, a new owner purchased the building and then demolished our client’s unit without permits while she was displaced for seismic retrofitting.Read More
Recovered on behalf of two long term San Francisco tenants who were fraudulently evicted from their home of over twenty years under the pretext of an owner move-in eviction.Read More
Recovered for tenant who was injured when their stairway railing collapsed at the tenant’s Mission District apartment building.Read More
Recovered in action for a group of tenants forced to vacate their San Francisco apartment house due to severe habitability defects including mold and water leaks.Read More