I am voting Yes on Proposition I on November 3rd, and I hope every Broke Ass reader, die-hard San Franciscan, and local who values the diversity that makes this city great will too.
What is it?
Prop I proposes an 18-month moratorium on the development of new luxury housing in the Mission District. . The goal of the moratorium is to provide leaders with time to come up with a plan to maintain and expand on the affordable housing presently available.
Why Support it?
No doubt your mailbox has been flooded with flyers trying to scare you into voting against this critical measure, telling you a vote for Prop I is a vote for rent increases and an even worse housing shortage than we’re suffering now. But it’s my strong belief, as both a tenants rights attorney and a Mission resident, that Prop I is critical to the survival of the Mission District we all know and love.
It’s no secret that rents in San Francisco have spiraled out of control, increasing on average at a rate of 9.2% annually over the last several years. Along with a dramatic increase in rents the city has seen a massive increase in the number of evictions, and the displacement of thousands of long-term tenants from historically lower-income neighborhoods like the Mission. This needs to stop.
The sad truth is, as property in this city becomes more and more valuable, landlords have more and more to gain by selling their property to developers, or getting rid of long-term residents in favor of new tenants who can and will pay a lot more in rent. And the Mission has become Ground Zero for these kinds of evictions. Unfortunately, when a Mission resident gets displaced, there’s often nowhere for them to go: new two-bedroom apartments in the neighborhood rent for $6,000-$9,800 a month while new condos are fetching between $1.5 and $2.5 million.
The obvious solution is to build more affordable housing in the Mission. And yet, it isn’t being built. Fewer than 12% of all units that are in the planning stages in the Mission are affordable to a family of four earning less than $122,300 (120% of the average household income). There are precious few lots left in the neighborhood, and every time a new condo goes up on one of them, we lose another chance at building affordable housing.
Prop I aims specifically to preserve these lots. During the proposed moratorium, community organizations and city officials have pledged to put together a Neighborhood Stabilization plan to ensure affordable housing actually gets built in the Mission. Neighborhood stakeholders have already developed a framework for such a plan, one which is supported by three current Planning Commissioners, and two former Commissioners. (https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/savethemission/pages/111/attachments/original/1444861408/Planning_for_People_Press_Conference.pdf?1444861408)
Why is it so important that we fight for what’s left of the Mission’s affordable housing potential? Just think about everything that makes the neighborhood great: the small mom-and-pop bodegas; the hole-in-the-wall taco shops; the colorful street art; the historically diverse make-up of the neighborhood’s residents. All of the things that make the Mission the Mission are in danger of being priced out of the neighborhood as property values and rents increase, high-income tenants move in, and the kinds of businesses that cater to them continue to follow suit.
What the Opposition is Saying:
Opponents would have you believe that Prop I will cause rents to go up, because demand for market-rate units will continue to increase while supply would stay static. But this argument is flawed. The City Comptroller’s report estimates just a 0.3 % increase on rents in the Mission as a result of the moratorium – a pittance compared to the 9.2% increase that the city has seen on average over the past several years. And that 9.2% annual increase in citywide rents? It’s taken hold as construction of market-rate housing has far out-paced that of affordable housing: since 2007, the city has built about 30,000 new units, 25,000 of which have been identified as market-rate. Construction of more market-rate housing at the pace we’re going simply doesn’t stop the runaway rent increases we all face.
For those who support Prop I – the majority of San Francisco’s County Supervisors, long-time local housing advocates, and the dedicated local volunteers and community organizations who are going door-to-door advocating for the measure – the choice is clear.
For you cynics who think it’s too late to stop the winds of change – okay. Maybe it is. But if you’re right, there’s no harm in calling a time-out and trying to fix the problem. If we can’t, at least we tried. But maybe – just maybe – taking action now could save the Mission.
Recovered on behalf of a group of 30 tenants living in an SRO in San Francisco who were living with horrendous conditions in their rent controlled apartments, including rodents, bedbugs, mold, water leaks and harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of three families living in a building in San Francisco’s SOMA neighborhood who were forced to live with substandard conditions for years as a result of their landlord’s negligence, including issues with lack of heat, lack of hot water and cockroach/rat infestations.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a couple living in a rent-controlled home in the outer Sunset neighborhood. Our clients were forced to vacate after the landlord served them with an Owner Move-In Eviction Notice. After the landlords failed to move into the property, our clients filed suit for wrongful eviction.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant in Russian Hill. Tenant was forced to vacate her illegal apartment in retaliation for reporting unlawful rent increases to the San Francisco Rent Board.Read More
Recovered for a single long-term tenant in San Francisco. Our client was forced to move out of his apartment as a result of extreme landlord harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of three long-term tenants in San Francisco’s Castro neighborhood who were constructively evicted due to noise and nuisance conditions created by their downstairs neighbors, which the owner refused to address.Read More
Recovered on behalf of elderly, disabled tenant who was forced to move out of her rent-controlled San Francisco apartment of 50 years after landlord/owner failed to resolve numerous building code violations that remained outstanding for over a decade.Read More
Recovered on behalf of seven tenants living in a makeshift boarding house in East Palo Alto.Read More
Recovered on behalf of two former San Francisco tenants who were evicted via an Owner Move-In Eviction and owner failed to occupy the unit as her primary place of residence.Read More
Recovered on behalf of an elderly long-term tenant who was forced to vacate her long San Francisco apartment as a result of her landlord’s refusal to address longstanding defective conditions, including lack of heat, mold, rodent infestations, and defective plumbing. Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant who was forced to vacate his home as a result of ongoing, disruptive construction and the owners’ refusal to provide him with alternative housing. Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco family that was constructively evicted from their home in the Richmond District as a result of unlawful rent increases, defective conditions and tenant harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a tenant living in an illegal “in-law” unit. In this case, a new owner purchased the building and then demolished our client’s unit without permits while she was displaced for seismic retrofitting.Read More
Recovered on behalf of two long term San Francisco tenants who were fraudulently evicted from their home of over twenty years under the pretext of an owner move-in eviction.Read More
Recovered for tenant who was injured when their stairway railing collapsed at the tenant’s Mission District apartment building.Read More
Recovered in action for a group of tenants forced to vacate their San Francisco apartment house due to severe habitability defects including mold and water leaks.Read More
For more information or to discuss your legal situation, call us today at (415) 649-6203 for a phone consultation or submit an inquiry below. Please note our firm can only assist tenants residing in San Francisco, Oakland & Berkeley.