There are many laws in place to protect the rights of tenants, including laws that dictate how a landlord must proceed when requesting to evict a tenant. For example, just because you’ve received an eviction notice doesn’t mean you need to leave the property. You and your landlord may be able to resolve the issues listed in the notice without taking any additional steps toward eviction.
However, a tenant who is served a Summons and Complaint for Unlawful Detainer must respond quickly. Failure to respond could result in a default judgment against the tenant, allowing the landlord to proceed with the eviction and making it much more difficult for a tenant to stay in their home. Understanding the eviction process and your rights can help you recognize if those rights have been violated and help you determine what type of assistance you may need.
It’s important to recognize that the Summons and Complaint is not the first step in the eviction process. Before the Summons is issued, the tenant must first receive a Notice asking them to resolve the problem. There are different types of Notices with varying deadlines, such as a Notice to “pay or quit” if you are behind on rent (in this instance, “quit” means move out) or a Notice to “perform covenants or quit” if the landlord is accusing you of violating the terms of the lease.
No matter what the issue is, the landlord must provide you with a written notice, properly delivered, that includes all information required by law; otherwise, it is not a legally valid Notice. Some Notices must include an opportunity for the tenant to “cure” the alleged violation, while others such as an Owner Move-In or Ellis Eviction do not. If you’re able to resolve the issue in the Notice by the requested deadline, the landlord should not take any additional action to evict you. If you refute the claims in the notice are true it is important to communicate that to the landlord, in writing before the notice period expires.
If you and your landlord are not able to resolve the issues described in the Notice, then the landlord may move ahead with an eviction lawsuit. To do this, the landlord must file a Summons and Complaint with the court to request that you are defined as an unlawful detainer – meaning you no longer have the right to occupy your rental unit. For this reason, the term “unlawful detainer” is sometimes used to refer to the whole eviction process, but receiving a Summons and Complaint for Unlawful Detainer does not guarantee an eviction.
The landlord begins the lawsuit by receiving a court order for the eviction and serving two documents to the tenant:
It is extremely important to respond to an Unlawful Detainer lawsuit before the deadline has passed. If you do not respond at all, the landlord can seek a default judgment, granting the landlord an automatic win and triggering the ability to have a sheriff force a tenant out of their home. After the deadline, a tenant’s legal options for responding to the lawsuit will be severely limited.
Generally, tenants will file a response to the Summons and Complaint known as an Answer. This is your chance to explain to the court why you should not be evicted or ask for more time to resolve the issue. While tenants can represent themselves and prepare a response on their own we strongly recommend seeking assistance through one of the many nonprofit organizations in the Bay Area, such as the Eviction Defense Collaborative, Legal Assistance for the Elderly, or Centro De La Raza. Before responding, read the complaint carefully and determine if it contains statements you may deny or defend against.
Once your Answer is served to the landlord and filed with the court, either you or your landlord can request a date for the eviction trial, where your dispute will be decided by a judge or jury. Do note that most cases are resolved in advance of trial via settlement.
A wrongful eviction is different from an unlawful detainer. A wrongful eviction occurs when attempts to evict or actually cause a tenant to move out without a “just cause” for eviction. In cities like San Francisco, Oakland, and Berkeley, a landlord must have a “just cause” to evict a tenant (such as non-payment of rent or an owner move in). Examples of a wrongful eviction are:
If you were wrongfully evicted from your residence you may be entitled to substantial financial compensation. Call the attorneys at Wolford Wayne LLP for a free consultation to discuss your options. We are committed to protecting tenants in San Francisco, Oakland, and Berkeley through dependable legal representation, and we can provide information specific to your case.
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco couple who were forced to give up their home of over twenty years after their landlord’s dog attacked and killed their dog.Read More
Recovered on behalf of an Oakland tenant who suffered a serious injury due to her landlord’s negligent maintenance of her home.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant who suffered personal injuries and was forced to vacate his home of fifteen years after dealing with many months of environmental contamination and disruptive and nuisance construction conditions.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a group of 30 tenants living in an SRO in San Francisco who were living with horrendous conditions in their rent controlled apartments, including rodents, bedbugs, mold, water leaks and harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of three families living in a building in San Francisco’s SOMA neighborhood who were forced to live with substandard conditions for years as a result of their landlord’s negligence, including issues with lack of heat, lack of hot water and cockroach/rat infestations.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a couple living in a rent-controlled home in the outer Sunset neighborhood. Our clients were forced to vacate after the landlord served them with an Owner Move-In Eviction Notice. After the landlords failed to move into the property, our clients filed suit for wrongful eviction.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant in Russian Hill. Tenant was forced to vacate her illegal apartment in retaliation for reporting unlawful rent increases to the San Francisco Rent Board.Read More
Recovered for a single long-term tenant in San Francisco. Our client was forced to move out of his apartment as a result of extreme landlord harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of three long-term tenants in San Francisco’s Castro neighborhood who were constructively evicted due to noise and nuisance conditions created by their downstairs neighbors, which the owner refused to address.Read More
Recovered on behalf of elderly, disabled tenant who was forced to move out of her rent-controlled San Francisco apartment of 50 years after landlord/owner failed to resolve numerous building code violations that remained outstanding for over a decade.Read More
Recovered on behalf of seven tenants living in a makeshift boarding house in East Palo Alto.Read More
Recovered on behalf of two former San Francisco tenants who were evicted via an Owner Move-In Eviction and owner failed to occupy the unit as her primary place of residence.Read More
Recovered on behalf of an elderly long-term tenant who was forced to vacate her long San Francisco apartment as a result of her landlord’s refusal to address longstanding defective conditions, including lack of heat, mold, rodent infestations, and defective plumbing. Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant who was forced to vacate his home as a result of ongoing, disruptive construction and the owners’ refusal to provide him with alternative housing. Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco family that was constructively evicted from their home in the Richmond District as a result of unlawful rent increases, defective conditions and tenant harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a tenant living in an illegal “in-law” unit. In this case, a new owner purchased the building and then demolished our client’s unit without permits while she was displaced for seismic retrofitting.Read More
Recovered on behalf of two long term San Francisco tenants who were fraudulently evicted from their home of over twenty years under the pretext of an owner move-in eviction.Read More
Recovered for tenant who was injured when their stairway railing collapsed at the tenant’s Mission District apartment building.Read More
Recovered in action for a group of tenants forced to vacate their San Francisco apartment house due to severe habitability defects including mold and water leaks.Read More