- Our Team
- Tenant Issues
In most cities, tenants don’t have to choose between finding a nice place to live and having a pet. Here in the Bay Area though, where the housing market is so tight, it’s a whole different story. In this article we explain the different local rules surrounding pets, support animals, and service animals for tenants.
Landlords have a right to prohibit tenants from having pets in their apartments. Because there is such high demand for apartments in the Bay Area, and no shortage of tenants vying for open apartments, landlords are in the driver’s seat when it comes to dictating terms. As a result, in San Francisco the vast majority of rental units do not allow pets.
If your lease does not allow pets and you get one anyway, you put your tenancy at risk. Breach of a material lease term is one of the grounds for eviction in both San Francisco and Oakland.
Though landlords may prohibit pets, tenants with a qualifying disability may be entitled to a support or service animal.
It is a common misconception that “support animal” and “service animal” are interchangeable terms. In fact, these terms have very different meanings under the law. Both may provide certain tenants with a way to have an animal regardless of what a lease says about pets.
Who qualifies for a support or service animal? To qualify for a support or service animal, a tenant must meet the definition of a person with a disability. The ADA defines an individual with a disability as a person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.
Under California law, the definition of disability is broader, and includes a mental or physical impairment, disorder, or condition that limits a major life activity. The definition of disability also includes a perception that the person has a disability, or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, a disability. “Major life activities” is a broad category. Examples of major life activities include, but are not limited to, physical, mental, and social activities and working. Whether a disability or condition “limits” a major life activity must be determined without regard to any mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
A support animal is an animal of any species that helps people with psychological disabilities. Animals have been shown to help reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. A support animal is not trained - they simply provide support by being there.
While support animals (also known as emotional support animals) need no special training, a person must still qualify as "disabled" to have a support animal.
By contrast, a “service animal” is a dog (or miniature horse) that is trained to perform tasks or do work for the benefit of a disabled person. This is a legal term that comes from Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The most common example of a service animal is a seeing eye dog. Other examples include dogs trained to alert people who are deaf, pull a wheelchair, or help people with seizures.
While most people might assume service animal are only for people with a physical disability, this is not actually the case. Rather, people with psychiatric conditions can also qualify.
Tenants with a qualifying disability have the right to a service or support animal in their home as a matter of law (See Unruh Civil Rights Act and Disabled Persons Act (CDPA), as well as under the ADA. Animals in these instances are considered more like assistive aids such as wheelchairs than like pets.
Generally landlords are required to make an exception to a no pets policy for support and service animals. However, a tenant cannot just move the animal in right away.
First, the tenant must follow the proper steps to get approval for the animal. First, a tenant must get a letter or prescription from a qualified professional (e.g. therapist or physician). The letter must show that the tenant qualifies as disabled and that the animal is part of their treatment for that disability. The tenant then must make a request to their landlord for a “reasonable accommodation” in the form of the animal.
A landlord cannot refuse a reasonable accommodation request. The key in these situations is the word “reasonable.”
A request may be unreasonable if it creates an undue financial burden on the landlord or fundamentally alters the nature of the housing. The animal also cannot pose a threat to others. Assuming that the request is not unreasonable, a landlord cannot refuse an accommodation request.
In evaluating a reasonable accommodation request, a landlord can only ask the following questions about the animal: 1) whether the animal is required because of the resident’s disability, and 2) what work or task the animal is trained to provide.
A landlord can request documentation showing that a tenant has a disability, and that they have a disability-related need for the animal. They can’t ask for specific information about the nature of a tenant’s disability.
If a landlord refuses a valid request for a reasonable accommodation, a tenant may have grounds for a disability discrimination lawsuit.
If a tenant ignores a landlord’s refusal and moves the animal in without permission, some landlords will bring an eviction lawsuit for breach of lease. In these situations, the tenant may end up defending themselves in an eviction lawsuit, and should be prepared to prove that they have a legitimate disability in court.
Recovered on behalf of a group of 30 tenants living in an SRO in San Francisco who were living with horrendous conditions in their rent controlled apartments, including rodents, bedbugs, mold, water leaks and harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a couple living in a rent-controlled home in the outer Sunset neighborhood. Our clients were forced to vacate after the landlord served them with an Owner Move-In Eviction Notice. After the landlords failed to move into the property, our clients filed suit for wrongful eviction.Read More
Recovered for a single long-term tenant in San Francisco. Our client was forced to move out of his apartment as a result of extreme landlord harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of elderly, disabled tenant who was forced to move out of her rent-controlled San Francisco apartment of 50 years after landlord/owner failed to resolve numerous building code violations that remained outstanding for over a decade.Read More
Recovered on behalf of two former San Francisco tenants who were evicted via an Owner Move-In Eviction and owner failed to occupy the unit as her primary place of residence.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant who was forced to vacate his home as a result of ongoing, disruptive construction and the owners’ refusal to provide him with alternative housing. Read More
Recovered on behalf of a tenant living in an illegal “in-law” unit. In this case, a new owner purchased the building and then demolished our client’s unit without permits while she was displaced for seismic retrofitting.Read More
Recovered for tenant who was injured when their stairway railing collapsed at the tenant’s Mission District apartment building.Read More
Recovered in action for a group of tenants forced to vacate their San Francisco apartment house due to severe habitability defects including mold and water leaks.Read More
Recovered on behalf of two long term San Francisco tenants who were fraudulently evicted from their home of over twenty years under the pretext of an owner move-in eviction.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco family that was constructively evicted from their home in the Richmond District as a result of unlawful rent increases, defective conditions and tenant harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of an elderly long-term tenant who was forced to vacate her long San Francisco apartment as a result of her landlord’s refusal to address longstanding defective conditions, including lack of heat, mold, rodent infestations, and defective plumbing. Read More
Recovered on behalf of seven tenants living in a makeshift boarding house in East Palo Alto.Read More
Recovered on behalf of three long-term tenants in San Francisco’s Castro neighborhood who were constructively evicted due to noise and nuisance conditions created by their downstairs neighbors, which the owner refused to address.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant in Russian Hill. Tenant was forced to vacate her illegal apartment in retaliation for reporting unlawful rent increases to the San Francisco Rent Board.Read More
Recovered on behalf of three families living in a building in San Francisco’s SOMA neighborhood who were forced to live with substandard conditions for years as a result of their landlord’s negligence, including issues with lack of heat, lack of hot water and cockroach/rat infestations.Read More
For more information or to discuss your legal situation, call us today at (415) 649-6203 for a phone consultation or submit an inquiry below. Please note our firm can only assist tenants residing in the Bay Area.