If your landlord enacts an Owner Move In Eviction and then never moves in? This is known as a bogus owner move in eviction. Tenants who have been forced to move out have grounds to sue for wrongful eviction. Recent studies show that this law has been frequently abused by owners as a means to evict low-rent-paying tenants.
Owner Move-in evictions, or “OMIs,” allow property owners to recover possession of a tenant-occupied unit for use as their primary home – or a relative’s use where the landlord already lives in another unit in the building. This law exists so that landlords who want to live in their own property can do so.
Recent studies show that this law has been frequently abused by owners as a way to evict low-rent-paying tenants
In July 2017 the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to amend the Rent Ordinance in an effort to change this. In this article we address owner move-ins generally, how to watch out for wrongful OMIs, and some of the features of the new amendment.
To qualify for an owner move-in eviction an owner must have a certain ownership interest (25% or more if they purchased after 2/21/91; 10% if prior). Owners are prohibited from recovering possession if there is a comparable vacant unit available. An owner is required to make the affected unit their primary home. An owner can only have one “principal place of residence.” If an OMI has ever been completed at a property (even by a previous owner), that unit becomes the only unit that can be used for OMIs moving forward. To initiate an OMI a landlord must provide written 60-day notice to the affected tenants. For more information on the notice requirements check out our website’s breakdown on owner move-in evictions here.
Following an OMI the owner must move into the affected unit within 90 days, and maintain the unit as their principal residence for a period of at least 36 consecutive months.
Unfortunately, many landlords are filing owner move-in evictions only to re-rent the unit to new tenants, rent it out on Airbnb or leave it vacant. This is known as a “Bogus OMI.” Though totally illegal, the City has done little to discourage landlords from doing this.
Tenants who have been evicted under the pretense of an owner move-in eviction where the landlord fails to move in may be entitled to substantial monetary damages as well as the right to move back into the unit. But how do tenants find out whether or not their landlord has actually moved in?
While there’s no easy answer, some tips include: Staying in touch with / checking in with former neighbors; driving by the property to check for signs that someone is actually living there; checking websites like AirBnB or Craigslist to see if their unit shows up in searches; checking the title history to see if the property has been sold; researching the property at the SF Rent Board to see if the OMI was registered; or, in some cases, hiring a private detective.
Some tenants are taken aback by the notion of snooping on their landlord but the number of bogus owner move-in evictions in San Francisco alone is staggering (CITE). And for tenants – particularly long-term rent controlled tenants – losing their home in this fashion can have an enormous financial impact. Investigators can discover whether your landlord is paying for utilities at the residence (or anywhere else), or claiming a homeowner’s tax exemption for another property (this exemption is generally only allowed for one’s primary residence). Contacting a tenant’s rights law firm or housing nonprofit may also be useful for this kind of research.
Pushing Back on Bogus OMIs: Reform by Board of Supervisors
In July 2017, the SF Board of Supervisors voted to pass reforms in an effort to curb bogus owner move-in evictions and provide stronger penalties for landlords who shirk the law. These changes include:
The hope is that these new rules will help discourage landlords from abusing their right to evict tenants under the guise of an owner move-in while also arming tenants and tenant advocates with more tools to go after those landlords who ignore the rules. Time will tell but this appears to be a step in the right direction to curb abuse.
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco couple who were forced to give up their home of over twenty years after their landlord’s dog attacked and killed their dog.Read More
Recovered on behalf of an Oakland tenant who suffered a serious injury due to her landlord’s negligent maintenance of her home.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant who suffered personal injuries and was forced to vacate his home of fifteen years after dealing with many months of environmental contamination and disruptive and nuisance construction conditions.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a group of 30 tenants living in an SRO in San Francisco who were living with horrendous conditions in their rent controlled apartments, including rodents, bedbugs, mold, water leaks and harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of three families living in a building in San Francisco’s SOMA neighborhood who were forced to live with substandard conditions for years as a result of their landlord’s negligence, including issues with lack of heat, lack of hot water and cockroach/rat infestations.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a couple living in a rent-controlled home in the outer Sunset neighborhood. Our clients were forced to vacate after the landlord served them with an Owner Move-In Eviction Notice. After the landlords failed to move into the property, our clients filed suit for wrongful eviction.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant in Russian Hill. Tenant was forced to vacate her illegal apartment in retaliation for reporting unlawful rent increases to the San Francisco Rent Board.Read More
Recovered for a single long-term tenant in San Francisco. Our client was forced to move out of his apartment as a result of extreme landlord harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of three long-term tenants in San Francisco’s Castro neighborhood who were constructively evicted due to noise and nuisance conditions created by their downstairs neighbors, which the owner refused to address.Read More
Recovered on behalf of elderly, disabled tenant who was forced to move out of her rent-controlled San Francisco apartment of 50 years after landlord/owner failed to resolve numerous building code violations that remained outstanding for over a decade.Read More
Recovered on behalf of seven tenants living in a makeshift boarding house in East Palo Alto.Read More
Recovered on behalf of two former San Francisco tenants who were evicted via an Owner Move-In Eviction and owner failed to occupy the unit as her primary place of residence.Read More
Recovered on behalf of an elderly long-term tenant who was forced to vacate her long San Francisco apartment as a result of her landlord’s refusal to address longstanding defective conditions, including lack of heat, mold, rodent infestations, and defective plumbing. Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco tenant who was forced to vacate his home as a result of ongoing, disruptive construction and the owners’ refusal to provide him with alternative housing. Read More
Recovered on behalf of a San Francisco family that was constructively evicted from their home in the Richmond District as a result of unlawful rent increases, defective conditions and tenant harassment.Read More
Recovered on behalf of a tenant living in an illegal “in-law” unit. In this case, a new owner purchased the building and then demolished our client’s unit without permits while she was displaced for seismic retrofitting.Read More
Recovered on behalf of two long term San Francisco tenants who were fraudulently evicted from their home of over twenty years under the pretext of an owner move-in eviction.Read More
Recovered for tenant who was injured when their stairway railing collapsed at the tenant’s Mission District apartment building.Read More
Recovered in action for a group of tenants forced to vacate their San Francisco apartment house due to severe habitability defects including mold and water leaks.Read More